<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is It Responsible to Anger the Muslim World?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citizensagainstsharia.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/is-it-responsible-to-anger-the-muslim-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citizensagainstsharia.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/is-it-responsible-to-anger-the-muslim-world/</link>
	<description>We're for freedom of expression and equality for women and religious minorities.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:41:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: citizensagainstsharia</title>
		<link>http://citizensagainstsharia.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/is-it-responsible-to-anger-the-muslim-world/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>citizensagainstsharia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizensagainstsharia.wordpress.com/2008/02/14/is-it-responsible-to-anger-the-muslim-world/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Additional note:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019975.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Robert Spencer&lt;/a&gt; points out that if the West were to ban insults to Islamic symbols, this would take something that is sacred to Muslims and require that non-Muslims also treat it as sacred; so it would then have a universal sacredness and give Islam superiority over other religions. This is a known agenda of the Islamists, and it would move their agenda of Islamizing the West a step forward.

It is for this reason, among others, that I oppose any ban on criticism of Islam or any other religion, even if some people are insulting and obnoxious about it. I don&#039;t like an obnoxious style, but the consequences of banning it are much worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Additional note:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/019975.php" rel="nofollow">Robert Spencer</a> points out that if the West were to ban insults to Islamic symbols, this would take something that is sacred to Muslims and require that non-Muslims also treat it as sacred; so it would then have a universal sacredness and give Islam superiority over other religions. This is a known agenda of the Islamists, and it would move their agenda of Islamizing the West a step forward.</p>
<p>It is for this reason, among others, that I oppose any ban on criticism of Islam or any other religion, even if some people are insulting and obnoxious about it. I don&#8217;t like an obnoxious style, but the consequences of banning it are much worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
